Following the latest developments in internet video delivery, it seems that despite of sluggish response by major players ( Microsoft and Adobe), web videos will eventually break free from the clutches of plugin environment. What that means to different standards of rich media delivery is a topic of another discussion. Here we will take a deeper look at the recent developments and their immediate implications.

Although HTML 5 is still in development stage, heavyweights (Apple and Google) are putting their weight behind it. The enthusiasm of 2 more major players Mozilla and Infibeam translates to a few more positive steps in the direction of plugin free video delivery.
Microsoft has been a little behind the curve in embracing emerging technologies of late, its resistance against an openly owned standard has partly been because of its efforts to push its own Silverlight video plugin as a web standard.
All major browser’s Safari, Chrome , Opera and Firefox have been actively involved in shaping the new standard. Internet explorer, despite of its initial resistance, is now extending full support to HTML5 videos, this is seen as a major boost as Internet explorer still has an enviable market share in the browser market , largely due to deep penetration of Microsoft’s windows Operating system.
If youtube’s opt-in trial is any indication, HTML5 may become mainstream sooner than what most experts predicted. Youtube has been an early user of H.264 codec and has pledged open support to WebM format. It may take them a while to discard flash completely. Things are obviously a little different for Apple, which has already discontinued flash support, forcing content developers to think of other ways to deliver content to the ever-increasing modern apple devices like ipad and iphone. Since apple is actually making the likes of you tube answer this need, the future of technologies not supported on these popular devices looks bleak, Flash will still have a role to play in the near future, but doesn’t look equipped enough for a long inning from here.
HTML5 player, being CSS and Javascript based, offers immediate advantages of player flexibility and resource economy. CSS and Javascript promise to make the player highly interactive in real-time, breaking free of the restrictive plugin based environments and since most plugins are known resource hogs, HTML5 based video delivery will hopefully be much lighter on your system.
Despite of the significant support given to this open standard by almost all major players, one shouldn’t hurry in writing the obituary of flash or Silverlight yet, despite of some advantages delivery over HTTP has its own restrictions which haven’t been addressed yet. Starting from a standard set of codecs, these restrictions stop heavy media distributors like You tube from migrating to the new standard completely.Though HTML5 is a tremendous development in taking videos to platforms not supported by flash, it still needs a lot of work to replicate Flash’s efficiency in delivery and distribution of videos . The overall adoption of the new standard is also a concern, since most websites over the internet allow only flash embedding, the switch to an open standard wont come all that naturally . Another concern the developers of HTML 5 need to answer is the limited support it offers to two-way audio-video communication, which is sublimely handled by Flash.
However, over the past few months HTML 5 has taken giant strides in shaking up the dominance of flash and other plug and play standards, it’s still in nascent stages and the future looks very promising, it would be exciting to see how soon it can become a universally accepted medium for delivering videos seamlessly across all browsers.


